Replacement Plan Proposal: Make Health Care Great Again Act of 2017

Avik-S.-A.-Roy_avatar_1467049054

Avik Roy wrote an excellent piece in Forbes taking on the issue of guaranteed issue head on:

Thanks To Democrats, Pre-Existing Conditions Outweigh The Uninsured In The GOP Obamacare Deal

Should we continue letting the “ludicrously dishonest” (well stated Avik Roy) presumptions of the ACA shape the future of our healthcare delivery system?

I think not.

Prior to the ACA, 6 states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Vermont and Washington) required guaranteed issue individual plans. In 2010 these states had some of the highest individual insurance rates in the country:

KFF 2010 Average Individual Premium Per Person

There were another 35 states that offered guaranteed issue high risk pools:  

High-Risk Pools For Uninsurable Individuals

That means 41 states already had access to guaranteed issue individual plans prior to the ACA. 

Here’s another point… around my part of the country (KS / MO) the guaranteed issue plans available prior to the ACA were less expensive than the non-subsidized 2017 individual plans! 

ACA proponents are quick to point out that there are more people insured now than prior to the ACA. What they fail to mention is that most of those gains are from new Medicaid enrollments (15 million) vs. state or federal Marketplaces (11 million):

Key Facts about the Uninsured Population

Since I don’t just want to be the one pointing out problems without offering a solution, here are my recommendations for an ACA replacement plan:

  • Repeal the ACA… All of it
  • Individual mandates and employer mandates would be gone (no more 1095-C forms… would anyone be disappointed?)
  • All individual health insurance premiums should be tax deductible just like employer group plans are tax deductible
  • States should decide if they want dependents covered through age 26
  • States should decide if they want to require all individual plans to be guaranteed issue
  • States that don’t require guaranteed issue should be required to have a high risk pool

Since government programs are the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on earth (Reagan / Byrnes), I am assuming subsidies are here to stay.

  • These high risk pools would be partially subsidized by states and the federal government to help make them affordable
  • Low income people would receive reduced tax credits / subsidies to purchase whichever health plans they want (no minimum essential coverage)

Keep in mind, the subsidies could be reduced (if not eliminated) for a lot of people when the cost of insurance goes back down.

  • States should decide if they want Medicaid expansion (and be willing to pay for it themselves)
  • Include tort reform legislation limiting frivolous lawsuits and capping malpractice settlements
  • Include Price Transparency legislation letting patients know up front what tests and procedures will cost

And since health insurance does not equal health care, there needs to be fundamental changes to physician access:

  • Direct Primary Care’s (DPC) monthly membership fees should be allowed as an eligible HSA / FSA expense (are you surprised I made it this far before mentioning HSA?)
  • States should be given block grants to explore more effective health care delivery systems (i.e. HSA & DPC) for Medicaid, Medicare, and VA

I think the replacement bill should be called… the “Make Health Care Great Again” Act.

Anyone willing to sponsor it?

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s