Avik Roy wrote an excellent piece in Forbes taking on the issue of guaranteed issue head on:
Should we continue letting the “ludicrously dishonest” (well stated Avik Roy) presumptions of the ACA shape the future of our healthcare delivery system? I think not. According to this article, 6 states required guaranteed issue individual plans prior to the ACA. Their rates were significantly higher than the national average. That’s what guaranteed issue does. There were another 35 states that offered guaranteed issue high risk pools:
Here’s another point… around my part of the country (KS / MO) the guaranteed issue plans available prior to the ACA were less expensive than the non-subsidized 2017 individual plans! That means 41 states already had access to guaranteed issue individual plans prior to the ACA.
ACA proponents are quick to point out that there are more people insured now than prior to the ACA. What they fail to mention is that most of those gains are from new Medicaid enrollments (15 million) vs. state or federal Marketplaces (11 million):
Since I don’t just want to be the one pointing out problems without offering a solution, here are my recommendations for an ACA replacement plan:
- Repeal the ACA… All of it
- Individual mandates and employer mandates would be gone (no more 1095-C forms… would anyone be disappointed?)
- All individual health insurance premiums should be tax deductible just like employer group plans are tax deductible
- States should decide if they want dependents covered through age 26
- States should decide if they want to require all individual plans to be guaranteed issue
- States that don’t require guaranteed issue should be required to have a high risk pool
Since government programs are the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on earth (Reagan / Byrnes), I am assuming subsidies are here to stay.
- These high risk pools would be partially subsidized by states and the federal government to help make them affordable
- Low income people would receive reduced tax credits / subsidies to purchase whichever health plans they want (no minimum essential coverage)
Keep in mind, the subsidies could be reduced (if not eliminated) for a lot of people when the cost of insurance goes back down.
- States should decide if they want Medicaid expansion (and be willing to pay for it themselves)
- Include tort reform legislation limiting frivolous lawsuits and capping malpractice settlements
- Include Price Transparency legislation letting patients know up front what tests and procedures will cost
And since health insurance does not equal health care, there needs to be fundamental changes to physician access:
- Direct Primary Care’s (DPC) monthly membership fees should be allowed as an eligible HSA / FSA expense (are you surprised I made it this far before mentioning HSA?)
- States should be given block grants to explore more effective health care delivery systems (i.e. HSA & DPC) for Medicaid, Medicare, and VA
I think the replacement bill should be called… the “Make Health Care Great Again” Act.
Anyone willing to sponsor it?